Adner R (2006) Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harv Bus Rev 84(4):98
Google Scholar
Adomavicius G, Bockstedt J, Gupta A, Kauffman RJ (2006) Understanding Patterns of Technology Evolution: An Ecosystem Perspective. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06). p. 189.
Aguilar FJ (1967) Scanning the Business Environment. Macmillan
Ajzen I (1985) From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J (eds) Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior. Springer, Berlin, pp 11–39
Chapter
Google Scholar
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Article
Google Scholar
Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1975) A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychol Bull 82(2):261–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076477
Article
Google Scholar
Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Google Scholar
Billanes JD, Ma Z, Jørgensen BN (2017) Consumer Central Energy Flexibility in Office Buildings. J Energy Power Eng 2017(11):621–630. https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-8975/2017.10.001
Article
Google Scholar
Billanes JD, Ma Z, Jørgensen BN (2018) The Bright Green Hospitals Case Studies of Hospitals' Energy Efficiency And Flexibility in Philippines. In: 2018 8th International Conference on Power and Energy Systems (ICPES). p. 190–5.
Bouten M (2008) Compatibility and technology acceptance : consolidating, validating and extending concepts. Maastricht University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration. Maastricht
Google Scholar
Brown A, Weiner E (1984) Supermanaging: How to Harness Change for Personal and Organizational Success. McGraw-Hill, New York
Google Scholar
Capra F, Luisi PL (2014) The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Book
Google Scholar
Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Huang P, Wu DJ (2012) Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem! the case of enterprise software. MIS Q 36(1):263–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410417
Article
Google Scholar
Christensen K, Ma Z, Jørgensen BN (2021) Technical, economic, social and regulatory feasibility evaluation of dynamic distribution tariff designs. Energies 14(10):2860
Article
Google Scholar
Christensen K, Ma Z, Varbak M, Demazeau Y, Jorgensen BN (2020a) Agent-based Simulation Design for Technology Adoption. SII 2020a - International Symposium on System Integration: IEEE; 2020a. p. 873–8
Christensen K, Ma Z, Demazeau Y, Jorgensen BN (2020b) Agent-based Modeling of Climate and Electricity Market Impact on Commercial Greenhouse Growers' Demand Response Adoption. RIVF International Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies (RIVF). Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: IEEE; 2020b. p. 1–7
Christensen K, Ma Z, Demazeau Y, Jørgensen BN (2020c) Agent-based Modeling for Optimizing CO2 Reduction in Commercial Greenhouse Production with the Implicit Demand Response. 6th IEEJ international workshop on Sensing, Actuation, Motion Control, and Optimization (SAMCON2020c). Tokyo, Japan: IEEJ Digital Library. p. 6
Christensen K, Ma Z, Jørgensen BN (2020d) (Submitted to Journal) Technical, Social and Regulatory Feasibility Evaluation of Electric Vehicle Charging Strategies Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews
Christensen K, Ma Z, Værbak M, Demazeau Y, Jørgensen BN (2019) Agent-based Decision Making for Adoption of Smart Energy Solutions. IV International Congress of Research in Sciences and Humanities Science and Humanities International Research Conference (SHIRCON 2019). Lima, Peru: IEEE
Chunlin G, Dequan H, Qinbo Y, Zhou M (2017) Dynamic sorting intelligent charging control strategy of electric vehicles based on time-of-use price. In: 2017 China International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC) 2017. p. 199–204
Clark BR (1965) Interorganizational Patterns in Education. Adm Sci Q 10(2):224–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391414
Article
Google Scholar
Cliff D, Grand S (1999) The Creatures Global Digital Ecosystem. Artif Life 5(1):77–93. https://doi.org/10.1162/106454699568683
Article
Google Scholar
Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol 94:S95–S120
Article
Google Scholar
Davenport TH, Prusak L (1997) Information Ecology: Mastering the Information and Knowledge Environment. Oxford University Press, Inc.
Google Scholar
Davis FD (1986) A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Sloan School of Management. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management.
Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Article
Google Scholar
Davis FD, Venkatesh V (1996) A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. Int J Hum Comput Stud 45(1):19–45. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040
Article
Google Scholar
Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1992) Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace1. J Appl Soc Psychol 22(14):1111–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
Article
Google Scholar
DeLone WH, McLean ER (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf Syst Res 3(1):60–95
Article
Google Scholar
DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The Iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48(2):147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Article
Google Scholar
European Comission: European Green Digital Coalition (2022) https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/european-green-digital-coalition. Accessed 24 Feb 2022
European Comission: Mobility Strategy (2020) https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-themes/mobility-strategy_en. Accessed 24 Feb 2022
Gangwar H, Date H, Raoot AD (2014) Review on IT adoption: insights from recent technologies. J Enterp Inf Manag 27(4):488–502
Article
Google Scholar
Gawer A, Cusumano MA (2014) Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. J Prod Innov Manag 31(3):417–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12105
Article
Google Scholar
Goodhue DL, Thompson RL (1995) Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q 19(2):213
Article
Google Scholar
Hack T, Ma Z, Jørgensen BN (2021) Digitalisation potentials in the electricity ecosystem: lesson learnt from the comparison between Germany and Denmark. Energy Informatics 4(2):27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-021-00168-2
Article
Google Scholar
Haeckel E (1866) Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Reimer, Berlin
Book
Google Scholar
Howard D, Ma Z, Engvang J, Hagenau M, Jørgensen K, Olesen J, et al (2020) Optimization of Energy Flexibility in Cooling Process for Brewery Fermentation with Multi-Agent Simulation. In: 6th IEEJ International Workshop on Sensing, Actuation, Motion Control, and Optimization. Shibaura Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
Huachun H, Haiping X, Zengquan Y, Yingjie Z (2012) Interactive charging strategy of electric vehicles connected in Smart Grids. In: Proceedings of The 7th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference 2012. p. 2099–103
Iansiti M, Levien R (2002) The New Operational Dynamics of Business Ecosystems: Implications for Policy, Operations and Technology Strategy. Harvard Business School Working Paper. No. 03–030
Iansiti M, Levien R (2004) Strategy as Ecology. Harv Bus Rev 82(3):68–78
Google Scholar
Iansiti M, Richards GL (2006) The Information Technology Ecosystem: Structure, Health, and Performance. The Antitrust Bulletin 51(1):77–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603x0605100104
Article
Google Scholar
Igbaria M, Schiffman SJ, Wieckowski TJ (1994) The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology. Behav Inform Technol 13(6):349–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449299408914616
Article
Google Scholar
Iyawa GE, Herselman M, Botha A (2016) Digital health innovation ecosystems: from systematic literature review to conceptual framework. Procedia Computer Science 100:244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.149
Article
Google Scholar
Kipnis D (1996) Trust and Technology. Trust in organizations. p. 39–50
Lai PC (2017) the literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management : JISTEM 14(1):21–38. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752017000100002
Article
Google Scholar
Levien R (2004) The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard business school press, Cambridge, MA
Google Scholar
Ma Z (2022) The importance of systematical analysis and evaluation methods for energy business ecosystems. Energy Informatics 5(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-022-00188-6
Article
Google Scholar
Ma Z, Energy JBN, Flexibility of The Commercial Greenhouse Growers, The Potential and Benefits of Participating in The Electricity Market. IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies North America (ISGT North America, (2018a) Washington, DC. IEEE, USA, p 2018
Google Scholar
Ma Z, Asmussen A, Jørgensen BN (2018c) Industrial Consumers’ Smart Grid Adoption: Influential Factors and Participation Phases. Energies 11(1):182
Article
Google Scholar
Ma Z, Kuusinen K, Kjærgaard MB (2019b) A survey of demand response adoption in retail stores DR control preferences, stakeholder engagement, and cross-national differences. Energy Informatics 2(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-019-0073-3
Article
Google Scholar
Ma Z, Christensen K, Jorgensen BN (2021) Business Ecosystem Architecture Development: a Case Study of Electric Vehicle Home Charging Energy Informatics 4:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-021-00142-y
Article
Google Scholar
Ma Z (2019) Business Ecosystem modeling - The Hybrid of System Modeling and Ecological Modeling: An application of the smart grid. Energy Informatics
Ma Z, Jørgensen BN, Asmussen A (2015) Industrial consumers' acceptance to the smart grid solutions: Case studies from Denmark. In: 2015 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies - Asia (ISGT ASIA). p. 1–6
Ma Z, Friis HTA, Mostrup CG, Jørgensen BN (2017a) Energy Flexibility Potential of Industrial Processes in the Regulating Power Market. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems. Porto, Portugal: SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, Lda. p. 109–15
Ma Z, Billanes JD, Jørgensen BN (2017b) A Business Ecosystem Driven Market Analysis: The Bright Green Building Market Potential. In: The 1st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Society. Santa Clara, California USA: IEEE
Ma Z, Santos AQ, Gamborg F, Nielsen JF, Johannesen JM, Jensen MDH, et al (2018b) Solutions for Remote Island Microgrids: Discussion and analysis of Indonesia’s remote island energy system. The International Conference on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (IEEE PES ISGT Asia 2018b). Singapore: IEEE
Ma Z, Broe M, Fischer A, Sørensen TB, Frederiksen MV, Jøergensen BN (2019a) Ecosystem Thinking: Creating Microgrid Solutions for Reliable Power Supply in India's Power System. 2019a 1st Global Power, Energy and Communication Conference (GPECOM). p. 392–7
Manning B, Runge B, Thorne C, Moore G (2002) Demand driven: 6 steps to building an ecosystem of demand for your business. McGraw-Hill Companies, New York
Google Scholar
Maracine V, Scarlat E (2008) Dynamic knowledge and healthcare knowledge ecosystems. In: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Knowledge Management
Mars MM, Bronstein JL, Lusch RF (2012) The value of a metaphor: Organizations and ecosystems. Organ Dyn 41(4):271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.08.002
Article
Google Scholar
Maryam Salahshour R, Nilashi M, Halina MD (2018) Information technology adoption: a review of the literature and classification. Univ Access Inf Soc 17(2):361–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0534-z
Article
Google Scholar
Molinillo S, Japutra A (2017) Organizational adoption of digital information and technology: a theoretical review. Bottom Line 30(1):33–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-01-2017-0002
Article
Google Scholar
Moore JF (1993) The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. Harper Paperbacks
Moore MJ (1996) Book Reviews. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A. J Power Energy 210(6):482. https://doi.org/10.1243/pime_proc_1996_210_076_02.
Moore GC, Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf Syst Res 2(3):192–222
Article
Google Scholar
NASA: Technology Readiness Level (2021) https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/heo/scan/engineering/technology/technology_readiness_level. Accessed 18 Jan 2022.
Nimalsiri NI, Mediwaththe CP, Ratnam EL, Shaw M, Smith DB, Halgamuge SK (2019) A Survey of Algorithms for Distributed Charging Control of Electric Vehicles in Smart Grid. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2019.2943620
Article
Google Scholar
Oh D-S, Phillips F, Park S, Lee E (2016) Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation 54:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004
Article
Google Scholar
Oliveira T, Martins MF (2011) Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation 14(1):110–121
Google Scholar
Oliver RL (1977) Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations: An alternative interpretation. J Appl Psychol 62(4):480–486. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.4.480
Article
Google Scholar
Parker GG, Alstyne MWV, Choudary SP (2016) Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You, 1st edn. W. W. Norton & Company, London
Google Scholar
Peltoniemi M, Vuori E. Business ecosystem as the new approach to complex adaptive business environments. Tampere, Finland: Frontiers of E-business research; 2004. p. 267–81.
Play CM, Rewards I (1975) J Humanist Psychol 15(3):41–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/002216787501500306
Article
Google Scholar
Power T, Jerjian G (2001) Ecosystem: Living the 12 Principles of Networked Business. FT.com
Qayyum F, Ali H (2012) Factors determining customers’ adoption of internet bankingResearch. Malardalen University Eskilstuna, School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology. Västerås
Google Scholar
Regeringens klimapartnerskaber - Energi- og forsyningssektoren (2020) I mål med den grønne omstilling 2030
Rogers EM (1962) Diffusion Of Innovations. The Free Press of Glencoe.
Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. Fifth ed. Free Press
Rong K, Shi Y (2015) Business Ecosystems: Constructs, Configurations, and the Nurturing Process. 1 ed. Palgrave Macmillan
Rubenstein-Montano B, Liebowitz J, Buchwalter J, McCaw D, Newman B, Rebeck K (2001) A systems thinking framework for knowledge management. Decis Support Syst 31(1):5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00116-0
Article
Google Scholar
Ruggiero TE (2000) Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Commun Soc 3(1):3–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
Article
Google Scholar
Sharma R, Mishra R. A Review of Evolution of Theories and Models of Technology Adoption. 2014.
Statistics Denmark: Bestanden af elbiler og plugin hybrider fordoblet (2021) https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/nyheder-analyser-publ/nyt/NytHtml?cid=33098. Accessed March 3 2022
Sykes TA, Venkatesh V, Gosain S (2009) Model of acceptance with peer support: a social network perspective to understand employees’ system use. MIS Q 33(2):371–393. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650296
Article
Google Scholar
Taherdoost H (2018) A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufacturing 22:960–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137
Article
Google Scholar
Tajfel H (1978) Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations, vol Book. Academic Press, Whole. London
Google Scholar
Tanev S, Thomsen MS, Ma Z (2010) Value co-creation: from an emerging paradigm to the next practices of innovation
Taylor S, Todd PA (1995) Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf Syst Res 6(2):144–176
Article
Google Scholar
The Danish Energy Agency (2019) Fakta om flexafregning
The Danish Ministry of Taxation: Markant afgiftslettelse sikrer 775.000 grønne biler (2020) https://www.skm.dk/aktuelt/presse-nyheder/pressemeddelelser/markant-afgiftslettelse-sikrer-775000-groenne-biler/. Accessed 3 Mar 2022
The Danish Energy Agency (2022) Danish climate policies. https://ens.dk/en/our-responsibilities/energy-climate-politics/danish-climate-policies. Accessed 24 Feb 2022
Thompson RL, Higgins CA, Howell JM (1991) Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Q 15(1):125
Article
Google Scholar
Tornatzky LG, Fleischer M, Chakrabarti AK (1990) The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books, Lexington
Google Scholar
Triandis HC (1977) Subjective culture and interpersonal relations across cultures. Ann N Y Acad Sci 285(1):418–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb29370.x
Article
Google Scholar
Tupes EC, Christal RE (1992) Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. J Pers 60(2):225–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00973.x
Article
Google Scholar
Værbak M, Ma Z, Christensen K, Demazeau Y, Jørgensen BN (2019) Agent-Based Modelling of Demand-Side Flexibility Adoption in Reservoir Pumping. 2019 IEEE Sciences and Humanities International Research Conference (SHIRCON) 2019. p. 1–4.
Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Manage Sci 46(2):186–204
Article
Google Scholar
Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Article
Google Scholar
Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q 36(1):157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Article
Google Scholar
Venkatesh V, Bala H (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Receiv: May 2007. Malden, USA: Zentralbibliothek der Wirtschaftswissenschaften in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. p. 273–315
Zeithaml VA (1988) Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J Mark 52(3):2. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446
Article
Google Scholar
Zhou F, Xu Q, Jiao RJ (2011) Fundamentals of product ecosystem design for user experience. Res Eng Design 22(1):43–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-010-0096-z
Article
Google Scholar