Key aspects | Reflection | Authors |
---|---|---|
Early-Stage Assessments | The study progresses to market analysis and business modelling, highlighting the need for comprehensive models that align with technology capabilities and market needs | Smith and Woodworth 2012; Yang et al. 2022; Meijer et al. 2019; |
Policy and regulation landscape | Navigating the complex regulatory environment is crucial for the successful deployment of energy grid technologies | Reyna and Chester 2017; Meijer et al. 2019; Rajavuori and Huhta 2020; |
Use case and Business case levels (SGAM) | This model appears to be more comprehensive compared to traditional R&D models, which may not have integrated technical, business, and policy layers as effectively | Priem et al. 2018: Albano et al. 2014; Mashlakov et al. 2019; Panda and Das 2021; Giordano et al. 2011; |
Digitalization and Digital Entrepreneurship | This aspect marks a significant evolution from earlier models that did not fully incorporate the transformative potential of digital tools and platforms in energy sector innovation | Bumpus 2019; Iria and Soares 2023; Bican and Brem 2020; Nambisan 2017; Parag and Sovacool 2016; |
Agile and Lean Methodologies | This approach, focusing on flexibility and user-centric design, is more dynamic compared to some traditional R&D methodologies that might be more linear and less adaptive to market changes | Duc et al. 2019; Jin et al. 2017; Shafqat et al. 2021; |
Intersection of UC and BC through Digital Entrepreneurship | The study suggests that digital entrepreneurship models act as a bridge between technical-functional aspects of UC and strategic-economic dimensions of BC | Wang and Shao 2023; Bumpus 2019; Satalkina and Steiner 2020 |