Skip to main content

Table 1 State of the art of voltage stability detection

From: A proposed PMU-based voltage stability and critical bus detection method using artificial neural network

References

Year

Method

Stability detection

Critical Bus detection

PV Integration

Stability Type

input

Test case

Performance

Yari and Khoshkhoo (2017)

2017

Lmn, FVSI, LQP and NVSI

Long-Term Voltage

Z, X, P, Q, V, θ, δ

9 bus

Zhou et al. (2010)

2010

ANN

Long-Term Voltage

P, Q, V, θ

39 bus

Mean error: 0.1205–0.6528%

Maximum error: 0.6566–2.2614%

Ashraf et al. (2017)

2017

ANN

Long-Term Voltage

P, Q and/or V, θ

14 bus, 118 bus

Maximum error: 0.055–0.4916%

Pérez-Londoño et al. (2017)

2017

SVM

Long-Term Voltage

V, P, Q

14 bus, and 30 bus

Accuracy: 99.9%

Nandanwar et al. (2018)

2018

PFDT and CBR

Long-Term Voltage

P, Q

30 bus

Accuracy: 94%

Su and Liu (2018)

2018

Random Forest

Long-Term Voltage

P, Q, V, θ

57 bus, Taiwan Power System (1821 bus)

Accuracy: 94.8–99.9%

Pinzón and Colomé (2019)

2019

Random Forest

Short-Term Voltage

V

39 bus

Mean error: 1.697–2.033%

Adhikari et al. (2020)

2020

Gaussian Process Regression, ANN, SVM, DT

Long-Term Voltage

V, θ

39 bus

MSE: 0.568–14.37%

Dharmapala et al. (2020)

2020

Random Forest

Long-Term Voltage

Z, P, Q, V, θ, δ

14 bus, 118 bus

RMSE: 0.61–5.07%

Mollaiee et al. (2021)

2021

DT, SVM, AdaBoost, Bagged Tree

Long-Term Voltage

P, Q, V, θ

39 bus, 118 bus

Accuracy: 69–96.02%

Rizvi et al. (2021)

2021

1D-CNN

Short-Term Voltage

V

30 bus, 39 bus, 118 bus

Accuracy: 92–100%

Proposed

2023

ANN

Long-Term Voltage

V, θ

14 bus

Accuracy: > 96%