Table 7 Comparison of results for IEEE 69-bus system with two DG units
From: A new optimal allocation of DGs in distribution networks by using coot bird optimization method
Method | Size (MW) | Location | PF | Total real power loss (kW) | Loss reduction (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GA (Shukla et al. 2010) | 0.555 | 11 | 1 | 71.7912 | 68.08 |
1.777 | 61 | 1 | |||
GA (Pisica et al. 2009) | 0.006 | 1 | 1 | 84.233 | 62.55 |
1.794 | 62 | 1 | |||
CSA (Shukla et al. 2010) | 0.6 | 22 | 1 | 76.4 | 66 |
2.1 | 61 | 1 | |||
PSO (Shukla et al. 2010) | 0.7 | 14 | 1 | 78.8 | 64.97 |
2.1 | 62 | 1 | |||
MTLBO (GarcÃa and Mena 2013) | 0.52 | 17 | 1 | 71.776 | 68.09 |
1.732 | 61 | 1 | |||
LSM (Kollu et al. 2014) | 0.4461 | 27 | 1 | 100.39 | 55.38 |
1.3791 | 65 | 1 | |||
AGA (Ganguly and Samajpati 2017) | 0.389 | 18 | 1 | 72.763 | 67.66 |
1.848 | 61 | 1 | |||
SFS (Nguyen and Vo 2019) | 0.531 | 17 | 1 | 71.68 | 68.14 |
1.781 | 61 | 1 | |||
CSFS3 (Nguyen and Vo 2019) | 0.531 | 17 | 1 | 71.68 | 68.14 |
1.781 | 61 | 1 | |||
CBOM | 0.531 | 17 | 1 | 71.677 | 68.144 |
1.781 | 61 | 1 | |||
ALOA (Ali et al. 2017) | 0.603 | 17 | 0.83 | 20.9342 | 90.69 |
1.2 | 61 | 0.8 | |||
CBOM | 0.522 | 17 | 0.828 | 7.204 | 96.798 |
1.735 | 61 | 0.814 |