Table 6 Comparison of results for IEEE 69-bus system with one DG unit
From: A new optimal allocation of DGs in distribution networks by using coot bird optimization method
Method | Size (MW) | PF | Location | Total real power loss (kW) | Loss reduction (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABC (Abu-Mouti and El-Hawary 2011) | 1.9 | 1 | 61 | 83.31 | 62.96 |
GA (Hassan et al. 2017) | 1.872 | 1 | 61 | 83.18 | 63.02 |
Analytical (Gözel and Hocaoglu 2009) | 1.808 | 1 | 61 | 92 | 59.1 |
GA (Pisica et al. 2009) | 1.794 | 1 | 61 | 83.43 | 62.91 |
CSA (Tan et al. 2012) | 2 | 1 | 61 | 83.8 | 62.74 |
SGA (Tan et al. 2012) | 2.3 | 1 | 61 | 89.4 | 60.3 |
PSO (Tan et al. 2012) | 2 | 1 | 61 | 83.8 | 62.75 |
MTLBO (GarcÃa and Mena 2013) | 1.82 | 1 | 61 | 83.323 | 62.95 |
BB-BC (Abdelaziz et al. 2015) | 1.873 | 1 | 61 | 83.225 | 63 |
SFS (Nguyen and Vo 2019) | 1.873 | 1 | 61 | 83.22 | 63.01 |
CSFS3 (Nguyen and Vo 2019) | 1.873 | 1 | 61 | 83.22 | 63.01 |
CBOM | 1.873 | 1 | 61 | 83.22 | 63.01 |
BB-BC (Abdelaziz et al. 2015) | 1.801 | 0.81 | 61 | 23.1737 | 89.697 |
ALOA (Ali et al. 2017) | 1.827 | 0.82 | 61 | 23.1925 | 89.69202 |
CBOM | 1.828Â Â | 0.8149 | 61 | 23.17 | 89.702 |