A new optimal allocation of DGs in distribution networks by using coot bird optimization method

Energy Informatics

Table 3 Comparison of results for IEEE 33-bus system with two DG units

Method	Size (MW)	Location	Total DG Size (MW)	Total real power loss (kW)	Loss reduction (%)
Method 2 (Mahmoud et al. 2015)	0.72	6	2.52	91.63	56.57
Method 2 (Mahmoud et al. 2015)	1.8	14	2.52	91.63	56.57
EA (Mahmoud et al. 2015)	0.844	13	1.993	87.172	58.68
EA (Mahmoud et al. 2015)	1.149	30	1.993	87.172	58.68
EA-OPF (Mahmoud et al. 2015)	0.852	13	2.01	87.17	58.69
EA-OPF (Mahmoud et al. 2015)	1.158	30	2.01	87.17	58.69
AM-PSO (Kansal et al. 2016)	0.83	13	1.94	87.28	58.64
AM-PSO (Kansal et al. 2016)	1.11	30	1.94	87.28	58.64
IA (Hung and Mithulananthan 2011)	1.800	6	2.520	91.63	56.61
IA (Hung and Mithulananthan 2011)	0.720	14	2.520	91.63	56.61
LSF (Hung and Mithulananthan 2011)	0.720	18	1.620	100.69	52.28
LSF (Hung and Mithulananthan 2011)	0.900	33	1.620	100.69	52.28
BSOA (El-Fergany 2015)	0.880	13	1.804	89.34	57.66
BSOA (El-Fergany 2015)	0.924	31	1.804	89.34	57.66
SFS (Nguyen and Vo 2019)	0.852	13	2.010	87.17	58.69
SFS (Nguyen and Vo 2019)	1.158	30	2.010	87.17	58.69
CBOM	0.852	13	2.009	87.17	58.69
CBOM	1.158	30	2.009	87.17	58.69