From: A new optimal allocation of DGs in distribution networks by using coot bird optimization method
Method | Size (MW) | Location | Total real power loss (kW) | Loss reduction (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Analytical (Acharya et al. 2006) | 2.49 | 6 | 111.24 | 45.12 |
Hybrid approach (Sultana and Roy 2016) | 2.49 | 6 | 111.17 | 45.16 |
GA (Hassan et al. 2017) | 2.38 | 6 | 132.64 | 34.56 |
Method 1 (Mahmoud et al. 2015) | 2.49 | 6 | 111.24 | 47.28 |
Method 2 (Mahmoud et al. 2015) | 2.6 | 6 | 111.02 | 47.38 |
Method 3 (Mahmoud et al. 2015) | 1.5 | 30 | 125.21 | 40.66 |
EA (Mahmoud et al. 2015) | 2.53 | 6 | 111.07 | 47.36 |
EA-OPF (Mahmoud et al. 2015) | 2.59 | 6 | 111.02 | 47.38 |
ELF (Hung and Mithulananthan 2011) | 2.601 | 6 | 111.10 | 47.34 |
IA (Hung and Mithulananthan 2011) | 2.601 | 6 | 111.10 | 47.34 |
LSF (Hung and Mithulananthan 2011) | 0.743 | 18 | 146.82 | 30.41 |
BSOA (El-Fergany 2015) | 1.8575 | 8 | 118.12 | 44.02 |
SFS (Koc 2022) | 2.590 | 6 | 111.02 | 47.38 |
CSFS3 (Nguyen and Vo 2019) | 2.590 | 6 | 111.02 | 47.38 |
CBOM | 2.575 | 6 | 103.97 | 50.723 |