Table 6 Results Overview
From: Peak load minimization of an e-bus depot: impacts of user-set conditions in optimization algorithms
Scenario | TG (min) | Preemption | V2G | Sub-fleet Size (#buses) | Peak load (kW) | Computational Time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | 10 | No | No | 100 | 7959 (390.92) | 0.001 (.0004) |
Heuristic | 10 | No | No | 100 | 1917 (81.82) | 0.221 (.015) |
TG | 60 | Yes | No | 100 | 2040 (74.23) | 7.84 (1.17) |
| Â | 30 | Yes | No | 100 | 1656 (29.69) | 12.01 (1.30) |
| Â | 10 | Yes | No | 100 | 1350 (0.00) | 32.97 (6.47) |
TSI | 60 | No | No | 100 | 2040 (74.23) | 18.57 (3.80) |
| Â | 30 | No | No | 100 | 1662 (41.11) | 64.07 (10.04) |
| Â | 10 | No | No | 100 | 1350 (0.00) | 1932.10 (2710.81) |
Bi-PF | 10 | Yes | Yes | 100 | 1305 (69.44) | 266.04 (82.46) |
FS | 10 | Yes | No | 50 | 1449 (71.78) | 6.96 (0.94) |
| Â | 10 | Yes | No | 25 | 1662 (108.59) | 2.67 (0.34) |
| Â | 10 | Yes | No | 10 | 1746 (138.08) | 1.06 (0.13) |
Lowest Peak | 10 | Yes | Yes | 100 | 1200 (0.00) | 349.07 (45.66) |
Shortest Time | 60 | Yes | No | 100 | 1950 | 6.01 |
Shortest Time with FS | 10 | Yes | No | 10 | 1950 | 0.812 |