Skip to main content

Table 6 Results Overview

From: Peak load minimization of an e-bus depot: impacts of user-set conditions in optimization algorithms

Scenario TG (min) Preemption V2G Sub-fleet Size (#buses) Peak load (kW) Computational Time (s)
Baseline 10 No No 100 7959 (390.92) 0.001 (.0004)
Heuristic 10 No No 100 1917 (81.82) 0.221 (.015)
TG 60 Yes No 100 2040 (74.23) 7.84 (1.17)
  30 Yes No 100 1656 (29.69) 12.01 (1.30)
  10 Yes No 100 1350 (0.00) 32.97 (6.47)
TSI 60 No No 100 2040 (74.23) 18.57 (3.80)
  30 No No 100 1662 (41.11) 64.07 (10.04)
  10 No No 100 1350 (0.00) 1932.10 (2710.81)
Bi-PF 10 Yes Yes 100 1305 (69.44) 266.04 (82.46)
FS 10 Yes No 50 1449 (71.78) 6.96 (0.94)
  10 Yes No 25 1662 (108.59) 2.67 (0.34)
  10 Yes No 10 1746 (138.08) 1.06 (0.13)
Lowest Peak 10 Yes Yes 100 1200 (0.00) 349.07 (45.66)
Shortest Time 60 Yes No 100 1950 6.01
Shortest Time with FS 10 Yes No 10 1950 0.812
  1. Note: Peak load values are means of 50 runs; SD indicated in parentheses